It’s fair to say that the Irish business establishment has been slow to use the web as a source of competitive advantage.
Looking across the major sectors – banking, insurance, telcos, utilities, retail, media – it’s hard to think of a single blue chip firm that has broken the mould and disrupted their market with a strong internet play. Although investment was made online, the nettle was never really grasped. (Ryanair is probably the exception that proves the rule).
One likely reason is the complacency brought on by the fat years of the Celtic Tiger. Which begs the question, will complacency be replaced by urgency now that the fat years have gone? The question occurred while reading a book called Zero Sum World by Gideon Rachman, a journalist with the Financial Times.
The book is about the change in global power politics since the financial crisis of 2008. Prior to the crash, in the period from 1991 to 2007, the world enjoyed what Rachman calls the “Age of Optimism”. During this time there appeared to be a broad consensus among the major powers that free markets and international trade would solve all our problems.
This was an era of unprecedented prosperity and peace (yes, despite 9/11, Iraq, Bosnia, et al this was a period of relative global calm). Instead of competing for power and resources, the big players like the US, the EU, Russia and China, were happy to grow rich together. Why argue over a slice of the pie when the pie kept getting bigger? This was a win-win world.
Since 2008 the world has been in retreat and the pie has stopped getting bigger. Competition is back. Any advantage that one power gains seems to be at the expense of another. If China forges stronger links with Brazil, the US is losing influence. If the EU sources oil from Azerbaijan, Russia is losing money and clout. I win, you lose. This is a zero sum world. A world that is much more volatile as the big players compete intensely with each other.
While competition might be dangerous in a global context, it can only be healthy for Irish business, particularly consumers. When times were good, there was little incentive to differentiate. Why invest in a competitive advantage when you didn’t really need to compete? Why fight over customers when one customer, for example, could have multiple mortgages, multiple credit cards and all the spin-offs associated with them? The big players were happy with the status quo: let’s grow rich together. The big loser was the customer, stuck with online services that can seem light-years behind those offered abroad.
But times have changed in Ireland too. Competition is back. Irish firms are fighting hard for every customer they can get. The best years to invest online – the cash-rich years of the boom – may have passed. But necessity is the mother of invention. Perhaps the new zero sum world will see the business establishment open its eyes to the web. And perhaps we’ll see some clever, game-changing internet moves in the coming years. The customer can only benefit.
March 28, 2011 at 5:27 am
I live part-time in Ireland, and have been coming here all my life (Irish parents). This attitude toward (non-)efficiency is not new, it was based in an old, conservative distrust of change, plus an almost built-in fear that change means loss of a job, influence, etc. We got a mortgage approved from Bank of Ireland in 2001. Imagine our surprise when we discovered that BOI has no customer service email! I Who, in this world, doesn’t have email? Business is still done as in Victorian days: the personal element is wonderful, but the rest of it… As of today, they still don’t have one.
March 29, 2011 at 10:18 am
Was thinking about this recently, in relation to the high street.
Why is it that Clery’s, Arnott’s, BT, A-Wear have no compelling ecommerce presence?
With all super-malls opening in the last 10 years and the costs associated with fit out and rent there was still no meaningful investment on line.
Why? I assume that they were making too much money.
This has allowed asos, Littlewoods and other players to invade this space and our native brands are left to play catch-up.
March 29, 2011 at 3:25 pm
That’s true. You would think the bigger shops would have a real ecommerce presence. I friend of mind had (past tense) a string of shops nationally, and I asked him why he didn’t have online shopping. He was very unwilling to post prices online, for fear of being undercut by the competition. But as in the above article, the web site could give better information. Quite a few times I find shopping sites which don’t list their address, directions, or even the town where they are located. The phone is a mobile, which doesn’t help, either. They’re very surprised when you call and ask where they are.
March 29, 2011 at 3:28 pm
Part 2: Your comment about the competition is right, as well. Several times we’ve bought something from N.I. because we didn’t know where to find the product here, then found out there was an Irish maker/supplier. I’d rather support the home team, but where are they?
March 30, 2011 at 3:36 pm
Hairy Baby is a pretty good example of a site that has used the web very succesfully as it’s primary retail channel.
Innisturkbeg is another.
Small examples maybe, but a start.
March 31, 2011 at 10:07 am
Hi Dave,
There are lots of examples of smaller Irish firms that have used the web brilliantly. It’s the bigger, established firms that seem to have let it slip by.
By the way, Lar, I think you’ll find that the A-Wear website is actually quite good. Maybe another exception that proves the rule…